Gas Pressure From the Endoscope: An Unexplored Contributor to Morbidity and Mortality?

Background It has been shown that the incidence of venous air embolism and venous carbon dioxide (CO2) embolism is high during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We examined insufflating gas flow and maximum pressure produced by three types of commonly used endoscopes because we could not readily locate technical data for endoscope gas flow and maximum emitted pressure in the manufacturer's manuals. Methods We tested the Olympus GIF-Q180 used for esophagogastroduodenoscopy, the CF-Q180 used for colonoscopy, and the TJF-Q180 used for ERCP (Olympus America Inc., Center Valley, Pennsylvania). Under three different clinical gas insufflation scenarios, we measured in vitro maximum gas pressure transduced from a closed space created at the endoscope tip in a worst-case scenario analysis. Results We showed that it is readily possible to generate a pressure (>5-30 times normal central venous pressure) in the air space at the tip of all three endoscopes when insufflation is activated and the gas egress is limited. Conclusions These findings shed additional light on in vivo occurrences of gas embolism during gastrointestinal endoscopy. We postulate that in addition to using exclusively CO2 as the insufflating gas, the risk of gas embolism can be further diminished by regulating insufflating gas pressure at the tip of endoscopes.

Case Report: Can Inhaled Adenosine Attenuate COVID-19?

This case report demonstrates a small repetition of the case series carried out in Italy wherein inhaled adenosine was administered to patients experiencing severe and worsening coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). The two cases are important not only because they were the first of their type in the United States, but also because both patients were DNR/DNI and were therefore expected to die. Study repetition is vitally important in medicine. New work in pharmacology hypothesizes that adenosine-regulator proteins may play a role in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 infection. Furthermore, adenosine, by interacting with cell receptor sites, has pluripotent effects upon inflammatory cells, is anti-inflammatory, and is important in tissue hypoxia signaling. Inhaled adenosine is potentially safe; thousands have received it for asthmatic challenge testing. The effects of adenosine in these two cases were rapid, positive, and fit the pharmacologic hypotheses (as seen in prior work in this journal) and support its role as a therapeutic nucleoside.

Manual Conservation of Supplemental Oxygen in Low-Resource Settings During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

SUMMARY STATEMENT: Using a simulated adult COVID-19 patient with hypoxemia, we investigated whether caregivers interrupting oxygen flow by manually occluding oxygen tubing with pliers during exhalation can conserve oxygen while maintaining oxygenation. Oxygen pinching reduced oxygen use by 51% to 64%, maintained simulated oxygen saturation between 88% and 90%, and increased simulated average alveolar partial pressure of oxygen from a room air baseline of approximately 131 to 294-424 mm Hg compared with 607 mm Hg with 10 liters per minute (LPM) continuous oxygen flow. Simulation provided a methodology to rapidly evaluate a technique that has begun to be used with COVID-19 patients in low-resource environments experiencing an acute oxygen shortage.

A Flexible Enclosure to Protect Respiratory Therapists During Aerosol-Generating Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Exposure of respiratory therapists (RTs) during aerosol-generating procedures such as endotracheal intubation is an occupational hazard. Depending on the hospital, RTs may serve as laryngoscopist or in a role providing ventilation support and initiating mechanical ventilation. This study aimed to evaluate the potential exposure of RTs serving in either of these roles. METHODS: We set up a simulated patient with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in an ICU setting requiring endotracheal intubation involving a laryngoscopist, a nurse, and an RT supporting the laryngoscopist. All participants wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). A fluorescent marker was sprayed by an atomizer during the procedure using 3 different methods for endotracheal intubation. The 3 techniques included PPE alone, a polycarbonate intubating box, or a coronavirus flexible enclosure, which consisted of a Mayo stand with plastic covering. The laryngoscopist and the supporting RT were assessed with a black light for contamination with the fluorescent marker. All simulations were recorded. RESULTS: When using only PPE, both the laryngoscopist and the RT were grossly contaminated. When using the intubating box, the laryngoscopist's contamination was detectable only on the gloves: the gown and face shield remained uncontaminated; the RT was still grossly contaminated on the gloves, gown, neck, and face shield. When using the coronavirus flexible enclosure system, both the laryngoscopist and the RT were better protected, with contamination detected only on the gloves of the laryngoscopist and the RT. CONCLUSIONS: Of the 3 techniques, the coronavirus flexible enclosure contained the fluorescent marker more effectively during endotracheal intubation than PPE alone or the intubating box based on exposure of the laryngoscopist and supporting RT. Optimizing containment during aerosol-generating procedures like endotracheal intubation is a critical component of minimizing occupational and nosocomial spread of SARS-CoV-2 to RTs who may serve as either the laryngoscopist or a support role.